Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro vs Nokia 8.3 | Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 765G | SpeedTest, Camera Comparison

Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro vs Nokia 8.3 | Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 765G | SpeedTest, Camera Comparison. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro and Nokia 8.3 5G are two new 5G smartphones launched in the market. In addition to 5G connectivity, these 2 phones also possess extremely great parameters.

Video Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro vs Nokia 8.3 | Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 765G | SpeedTest, Camera Comparison:

In addition, the display of Mi 10T / 10T Pro also supports HDR10 standard and DCI-P3 color range. Due to not using the AMOLED screen, the device is equipped with a fingerprint side.

The back of the Mi 10T Pro stands out with a huge huge camera cluster and has a quite different design from previous Xiaomi products. It includes 3 cameras: a 108MP wide-angle camera, a 13MP super wide-angle camera and a 5MP AF macro camera.

In terms of performance, the Snapdragon 765G on Nokia 8.3 is a gaming chip with a clock speed of up to 2.4 GHz, combined with 8 GB of RAM, ensuring fast response to all daily usage, as well as playing titles. heaviest game 2020 in a stable way.

Nokia 8.3 owns a large size PureDisplay screen, up to 6.81 inches Full HD +, supports vivid HDR content, and a mole design contains a modern selfie camera.

Nokia 8.3 is a phone with a battery capacity of 4,500 mAh and supports fast charging 18W via USB Type-C to ensure a long time using the device, meeting the needs of work and entertainment during the day.

Overall, Nokia has shown a strong return when launching a phone with outstanding features, not inferior to high-end smartphones today. Surely for fans of Nokia will not be able to miss a super product like this.

Thanks for reading ! If there are questions about “Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro vs Nokia 8.3 | Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 765G | SpeedTest, Camera Comparison“, Camera you can comment I will try to answer soon. Please like, subscribe to my channel to motivate me to make even better videos or post.
SUBCRIBE MY CHANNEL HERE !
See more: